Innovating The Next Big Thing February 8, 2010 ph.gif
ph.gif
Sections

Network & Information Security
Terrorism & Counterterrorism
Homeland Security & Defense
Strategic Thinkers
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Reader Reactions
About

Our Publications

TechnologyInnovator
EnterpriseInnovator
SecurityInnovator
WirelessInnovator 

Contact Us

• Due to an epidemic of spam, we no longer check incoming email!

SecurityInnovator Headlines

Cyberwarfare Headline News
Biometrics & Surveillance Headline News
Terrorism Headline News
Guerrilla Warfare Headline News
Nuclear Strategy Headline News
WMD Headline News

Security Innovators

Stratfor Geopolitical Report
Stratfor Daily Podcast
Computerworld Security Blog
eWeek Security Blog
Information Security
Infoworld Zero Day Security
Cheap Hack: Larry Seltzer's New Blog
McAfee Avert Labs Blog
Mike Rothman's Blog
Network Computing Daily Blog
NetworkWorld, Buzzblog
Security Fix, Brian Krebs
ZeroDay, Ryan Naraine

Next Innovators

Over the River
eMarketer 
TechnologyPundits
Security Insights Blog 
McAfee AudioParasitics
Strand Consult
Ovum
The Eye For Innovation
Rethink Research
• Innovation Insights
Innoblog
Strategy and Innovation
The Gadgeteer
Handheld Speech
Ghost City

Iraq Study Group Report

Strategy for Combating Terror

Homeland Security

Technology for a Small Planet

Writers Wanted

Writers Wanted

Books on Terrorism

Books on Network Security

Books on WMD

Terror Alert Level


Feedjit Live Web Stats


McAfee AudioParasitics


 
Buy Our Book!


 
Ads

ph.gif ph.gif
Homeland Security & Defense Less Lethal Solutions I: As War on Terror Continues, Non-Lethal Weapons Find a Growing Battlefield Role
Oct 21, 2007 – By Barry Zellen

Long a popular tool for civilian law enforcement and riot control, non-lethal weapons (NLWs) are increasingly being used by military professionals who find themselves engaged in protracted counterinsurgency and post-conflict missions, where the use of deadly force can often clash with the political and diplomatic dimensions of their missions. Case in point: the September 16th incident involving Blackwater International that resulted in the shooting deaths of 17 Iraqi civilians and the injury of 24 others while protecting a U.S. State Department convoy. A less lethal solution can help reduce diplomatic tensions as America’s warfighters struggle to pacify insurgencies that threaten to topple our new democratic allies from Afghanistan to Iraq, where leaders face rising domestic discontent with each new civilian casualty.
 
To help American forces develop and diversify its non-lethal arsenal, in July 1996 the U.S. Department of Defense issued a policy directive on NLWs, establishing DOD policies and responsibilities for the development and deployment of NLWs, and designating the Commandant of the United States Marine Corps (USMC) as the executive agent for DOD’s Non-Lethal Weapons Program. The Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate (JNLWD), based in Quantico, Virginia, was created to take charge of DOD’s identification, evaluation and development of NLWs, working with each of the armed services. Its motto is “Pax Custimus, Vita Custimus,” which in Latin means “Safeguarding Peace, Safeguarding Life.”
 
New NLW Technologies and the Post Cold War Era
The military utility of NLWs became increasingly clear during the chaotic days of the early post-Cold War era, when the word “Balkanization” described the crumbling international order, and ethnic cleansing and inter-ethnic violence dominated the international security landscape. Before the Cold War’s end, NLWs in the military arsenal were more traditional tools, like concertina wire, tear gas canisters, water cannons, and rubber bullets. 

But during the 1990s, a new crop of technologies entered the non-lethal arsenal. During the withdrawal of UN forces from Somalia in Operation United Shield in 1995, this new generation of NLW technology was deployed operationally for the first time, including such tools as sticky foam guns, anti-traction lubricants, and beanbag ammunition. NLWs were also deployed in Kosovo, and have found repeated use during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom, providing American forces with an alternative to deadly force on the asymmetrical battlefields of the war on terror, such as Vehicle Lightweight Arresting Devices (VLADs), and Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADs), which have been deployed at checkpoints to help protect soldiers from approaching vehicles, providing a less lethal substitute for deadly force. Flash-bang grenades were deployed during the battle of Fallujah, providing a less lethal alternative to fragmentation munitions, reducing collateral civilian deaths.  
 
In its 2003 Assessment of Non-Lethal Weapons Science and Technology, the Naval Studies Board (NSB) recommended that the JNLWD “focus its resources on stimulating and exploring new ideas, and on strengthening the DOD’s ability to characterize the effects and effectiveness” of NLWs. It also recommended that the JNLWD narrow its mission space to “speed transformation of NLWs from specialty status to that of fully integrated warfighting options through strong advocacy and to increase confidence in non-lethal weapons options by expanding DOD’s understanding of the effects of NLWs on human and materiel.” According to 2006 USMC Concepts + Programs report, The U.S. Marine Corps: Creating Stability in an Unstable World, “NLWs provide the warfighter and senior leadership with additional options for responding to irregular challenges,” and “given the desire of our enemies to strike in the United States, non-lethal weapon capabilities for National Guard, Reserves and active forces in homeland defense and civil support operations will be critical in site security, maritime interdiction, area denial and consequence management operations.”

Between Shout and Shoot
I spoke with Capt. Teresa Ovalle, Strategic Communications Officer at the JNLWD, who noted there “has been an increase in non-lethal weapons available to our warfighters. Technology, availability, and requirements are all factors in the development and fielding of non-lethal weapons.” Ovalle explained that “NLWs are designed and employed to achieve military objectives while minimizing human casualties or damage to property and equipment,” and that they’re “used as part of continuum of the escalation of force. They give the commander on the ground another opportunity to potentially de-escalate a situation. NLWs are often the difference between ‘shoot’ and ‘shout’.” She added that NLWs “are applicable to the entire range of military operations, from humanitarian efforts to the Global War on Terrorism,” and as such “they offer the warfighter an option to something other than lethal means, which can potentially de-escalate a situation.”
 
According to Ovalle, “the types of missions supported by non-lethal weapons include: checkpoint security, facility or infrastructure security, entry control points, humanitarian aid distribution security, maritime or port security, crowd or mob dispersal,” and “as research, development, testing, and evaluation continue to evolve, the Department of Defense is examining their future use in support of a variety of missions, such as temporarily disabling combatants, crowd or mob dispersal, disabling or disrupting logistics operations, perimeter security, checkpoints, and rendering enemy assets inoperable with little to no collateral damage. Non-lethal weapons do not replace the need for lethal force but enhance the capability of U.S. forces to accomplish mission objectives.”
 
Ovalle pointed out that NLWs offer “both high- and low-tech solutions to warfighter requirements,” and both these high- and low-tech capabilities “offer the commander on the ground another option in the escalation of force.” She noted there are a “wide range of NLW technologies. Blunt impact munitions are an example of kinetic technology. Electro-muscular incapacitation and Active Denial technologies are examples of other cutting edge NLW technologies.” The latter technology, which directs a millimeter-wave energy beam at crowds causing a burning sensation known as the “goodbye effect,” has been developed by Raytheon, and was recently demonstrated at Quantico on October 25. While well along in development, and sought by Marines to facilitate a less lethal approach to their pacification efforts in Iraq, the "pain ray" has yet to be deployed to the field.
 
Having a non-lethal option can make operating in a post-conflict environment go easier, Ovalle explained, since “through those efforts, local government and populace gain confidence of the warfighter’s ability to minimize casualties and collateral damage.” She explained that “non-lethal weapons can potentially play an important role in military operations across the spectrum of conflict from low intensity conflict through major theater operations,” and “can protect U.S. forces by providing troops with non-lethal counter-personnel and counter-materiel capabilities to engage targets at extended ranges and help to protect non-combatants in the escalation of force.”
 
Ovalle notesd that “various field reports have validated the successful employment of NLWs,” and recounted the following examples.
  • In southeastern Kosovo in April 2000, the U.S. Army’s Task Force Falcon was the first American unit to use NLWs in a tactical situation, and the military policemen serving as peacekeepers used stinger rounds, sponge grenades, and foam batons -- all 40mm rounds fired from M203 grenade launchers -- to move a crowd in defense of a landing zone.
  • In April 2003, at the Rasheed Military Base in Iraq, civilians were looting the quartermaster’s building inside the perimeter, and using a public address system, spotlights, non-lethal weapons, and riot batons in conjunction with lethal weapons, U.S. military personnel were able to clear approximately one thousand people from the area within 10 minutes.
  • Shortly after the capture of Baghdad in April 2003, U.S. Army MPs and Marine Corps units conducted searches for Baath Party members. Trained in the use of the NLCS (Non-Lethal Capabilities Sets), the units used these capabilities to suppress urban crowds that attempted to interfere with the operations, and NLCS were also provided to Quick Reaction Forces (QRFs) to use in the relief of small units that have been surrounded by hostile crowds.
  • In 2004, during Operation Secure Tomorrow in Haiti, the Vehicle Lightweight Arresting Device (VLAD) was used successfully to stop vehicles during nighttime curfew hours in Haiti, adding that the VLAD was also successfully used in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Vehicle Lightweight Arresting Device stops a speeding car during training
at Fort Leonard Wood, MO. Photo by: Capt. Teresa Ovalle.
  • The Individual Serviceman Non-Lethal System (ISNLS) is being used as perimeter security weapon around several operating bases in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) to keep civilians from breaching base perimeters, prevent theft of the fencing around the perimeters and marking and tagging individuals for later apprehension.”
  • In February 2006, the U.S. Army procured non-lethal Optical Distractors to support OIF missions.


A soldier has a GBD-IIIC Optical Distractor mounted to his weapon during training at the Inter-service 
Non-lethal Individual Weapons Instructor Course in Fort Leonard Wood, MO. Photo by: Capt. Teresa Ovalle.
  • NLWs are also being utilized by the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), which is using the Running Gear Entanglement System (RGES) to intercept drug smugglers and illegal migrant boats in or near the coastal waters of the US, and which in its migrant and drug operations, is using both OC Aerosol and Pepperball Systems to enforce order and compliance during volatile close quarters encounters.


» Send this article to a friend...
» Comments? Tell us what you think...
» More Homeland Security & Defense articles...

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Search SecurityInnovator

ph.gif ph.gif
Support This Site



Newest Articles

• 12/2 WMD Panel Releases Report to Congress: World at Risk: Nuclear and Biological Weapons Pose Greatest Peril
• 11/28 Opinion Journal: India's Antiterror Blunders; Years of appeasing militants has made the problem worse
• 11/27 Stratfor Red Alert: Red Alert: Possible Geopolitical Consequences of the Mumbai Attacks
• 11/27 Stratfor Red Alert: India: The Need to React
• 11/26 Security Insights: Three kids + one desk top computer = must have time limits
• 11/26 Stratfor Global Security and Intelligence Report: Workplace Violence: Myths and Mitigation
• 11/25 Heritage Web Memo: Pentagon Should Battle Pirates and Terrorists with Laser Technology
• 11/24 Stratfor Geopolitical Intelligence Report: Obama: First Moves
• 11/21 Heritage Web Memo: Anti-Piracy Initiatives Should Reflect U.S. Maritime Interests
• 11/20 Heritage Web Memo: Europe Anti-Missile Defense System: Standing Up to Russia's Threats
• 11/19 Stratfor Global Security and Intelligence Report: The Barrio Azteca Trial and the Prison Gang-Cartel Interface
• 11/18 Technology Pundits: Microsoft Moves to Zero Cost Anti Virus Service
• 11/17 Security Insights: The Net’s A Bit Safer Without McColo
• 11/17 Security Insights: Tips on creating p@ssw0rds for teens and tweens
• 11/17 Security Insights: The Impact of Recent PCI DSS Announcements
• 11/17 Stratfor Geopolitical Intelligence Report: On G-20 and GM: Economics, Politics and Social Stability
• 11/14 Security Insights: Protecting your Data with Education
• 11/13 Security Insights: Focused On Security
• 11/13 Security Insights: Focused On Security
• 11/13 Heritage Web Memo: Getting the Big Ideas Right: The Strategic Concepts that Helped Achieve Substantial Progress in Iraq
• 11/12 Stratfor Global Security and Intelligence Report: Worrying Signs from Border Raids
• 11/11 Security Insights: Phishing and Faxing – This Time It’s Good to Be Lazy!
• 11/10 Stratfor Geopolitical Intelligence Report: Iran Returns to the Global Stage
• 11/10 Security Insights: Tips on social networking for parents
• 11/10 Heritage Web Memo: The Global Response to a Terror-Generated Energy Crisis
• 11/6 Security Insights: Network Risk Control
• 11/6 Stratfor Global Security and Intelligence Report: Obama and the Presidential Security Challenge
• 11/5 Stratfor Geopolitical Intelligence Report: Obama’s Challenge
• 11/5 Security Insights: Checking your kids browser history
• 11/4 Security Insights: Why Does Japan Have 10x Fewer PC Infections Than the US?
• 11/4 Security Insights: Introducing the Third Generation of NAC
• 11/4 Security Insights: Millions Spent On Microsoft Flaw, But Not By McAfee Customers
• 11/4 Southern Discomfort: Rising violence along southern frontier threatens to engulf border region in chaos
• 10/31 Security Insights: Another Record Quarter for McAfee
• 10/31 Security Insights: Teaching your kids to be cybersmart
• 10/30 Security Insights: Mom’s report that cybersafety of their teens worries them more than drunk driving
• 10/30 Heritage Web Memo: The New Cold War: Reviving the U.S. Presence in the Arctic
• 10/29 Security Insights: Focus-ing on Data Protection
• 10/27 Security Insights: FTC Shuts Down “HerbalKing” Spam Ring
• 10/27 Security Insights: Consumerization Defines a New IT Security Reality
• 10/27 Stratfor Geopolitical Intelligence Report: 2008 and the Return of the Nation-State
• 10/24 Security Insights: Mobile Phones Are Vulnerable to Attack
• 10/22 Security Insights: I’m a worried parent just like you
• 10/22 Stratfor Terrorism Intelligence Report: Jihadist Ideology and the Targeting of Humanitarian Aid Workers
• 10/21 Security Insights: McAfee’s Initiative to Fight Cybercrime – A Noble Cause
• 10/20 Security Insights: The First Security Innovation Alliance Developer Conference
• 10/20 Stratfor Geopolitical Intelligence Report: The United States, Europe and Bretton Woods II
• 10/19 Security Insights: McAfee’s New Consumer Products Lead The Industry
• 10/17 Security Insights: Quantum Cryptography a reality?
• 10/16 NSA Sortable Class Schedule (Beta)

AddThis Feed Button

DefenseLink

• 2/8 Gates: Iran's Nuclear Program Puts Middle East in Danger
• 2/8 Guard Responds in Record D.C. Snowfall
• 2/8 Haitian Leader Visits USS Bataan
• 2/7 Tough Sanctions Could Still Work in Iran, Gates Says
• 2/6 Guard Supports Washington Blizzard Response
• 2/6 Gates: Iran's Nuke Program Puts Middle East at Risk
• 2/5 Military Prepares to Support Super Bowl XLIV
• 2/5 Troops Overseas to Get Live Super Bowl Feed
• 2/5 Gates Pledges Mine-resistant Vehicles to Allies
• 2/5 Iraqi Forces Arrest Terrorism Suspects
• 2/5 Study Measures Traumatic Brain Injury
• 2/5 NORAD Plans Air Patrols for Super Bowl
• 2/5 Military to Continue China Outreach, Official Says
• 1/22 First Open Gov Deadline Brings Online Treasure Trove of Information
• 1/23 Another Milestone In Making Government More Accessible and Accountable
• 1/27 Transparency: The Tale of the Tape
• 2/5 Guardsmen Prepare for Second Major East Coast Storm
• 2/5 Force Detains Suspects, Seizes Weapons in Afghanistan
• 2/5 Mullen Urges Self-Reflection, Sober Analysis by Leaders
• 2/5 Face of Defense: Airman Tells Cancer Survival Story
• 2/4 Rehearsal Preps 101st for Afghanistan Mission
• 2/4 Sexual Assault Task Force Urges More Oversight
• 2/4 Review Strikes Right Balance for Military, Admiral Says
• 2/4 Cybersecurity Seizes More Attention, Budget Dollars
• 2/4 Comptroller Lists Priorities for Budget Request
• 2/4 McChrystal Notes Progress in Afghanistan
• 2/4 Route-clearance Soldiers Experience Firsts
• 2/4 National Guard to Assist Puerto Rico Police
• 2/4 Force Captures Taliban Leader, Seizes Weapons
• 2/4 Face of Defense: Wounded Soldier Continues Service

VOA News - War/Conflict stories

• 2/8 Yemeni Humanitarian Crisis Deepens
• 2/8 Al-Qaida Threatens to Attack US Interests 'Everywhere'
• 2/8 Somali Capital Braces for All-Out War
• 2/8 Thousands Flee Ahead of NATO Offensive in Southern Afghanistan
• 2/8 Iran Orders Boost in Uranium Enrichment
• 2/8 Terror Attacks Continue to Traumatize Somalis
• 2/8 Hamas Chief: 'No Prospect' of Israeli-Arab Peace Deals
• 2/7 Pakistan Army Recaptures NW Militant Stronghold

Ads

ph.gif
ph.gif Top ph.gif

© 2008 SecurityInnovator. All rights reserved.